By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.

We Research

Producing cutting edge authentic and accurate reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuses of the ‘war on terror’. 

Call our helpline
0300 030 2243
Email us at
casework@cage.ngo

WE RESEARCH

Unique insights

Researching the War on Terror

We produce cutting edge reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuse of due process and the erosion of the rule of law in the context of the ‘war on terror’. 

Thanks to our unique access to impacted individuals and communities and the trust established with them, we are able to build our reports on unmatched authentic and accurate primary source information.

In addition, our empirical analysis and investigations into subjects related to far-reaching impacts of the ‘war on terror’ on law, people and communities, mean that our research reports are widely referenced and acknowledged by leading academics and organisations.

Our research and analysis aims to cut through the noise and provide an invaluable critical perspective for our advocacy work.

Reports

News Categories
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Criminalising Non-Violent Organisations: CAGE submission to the UK Government review of the Muslim Brotherhood

November 4, 2014
<div class="field_c_p_img"> <hr /> <h5><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/muslimb.pdf">[fusion_button link="http://www.cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Criminalising-Non-Violent-Organisations-CAGE-submission-to-the-UK-Government-review-of-the-Muslim-Brotherhood.pdf" title="" target="_blank" link_attributes="" alignment="center" modal="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" color="default" button_gradient_top_color="" button_gradient_bottom_color="" button_gradient_top_color_hover="" button_gradient_bottom_color_hover="" accent_color="" accent_hover_color="" type="" bevel_color="" border_width="" size="large" stretch="no" shape="" icon="" icon_position="left" icon_divider="no" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset=""]Download submission here[/fusion_button]</a></span></h5> <hr /> <div class="page" title="Page 4"> <div class="section"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> In the following brief, CAGE contributes to the UK Government’s review of the Muslim Brotherhood by highlighting a number of key concerns. <div class="page" title="Page 5"> <div class="section"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> First, the brief challenges the central charge prompting this review, that the Muslim Brotherhood might be an extremist organisation. Second, the brief questions the Government’s definitions of what constitutes ‘extremism’ and ‘violent extremism’ and its insistence on conflating the two terms. Third, the brief raises concerns relating to the integrity of the review and the efficacy of its potential outcomes. </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="field_pub_report"></div>

Blowback - Foreign Fighters and the Threat they Pose

July 17, 2014
[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="no" hundred_percent_height="no" hundred_percent_height_scroll="no" hundred_percent_height_center_content="yes" equal_height_columns="no" menu_anchor="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="center center" background_repeat="no-repeat" fade="no" background_parallax="none" enable_mobile="no" parallax_speed="0.3" video_mp4="" video_webm="" video_ogv="" video_url="" video_aspect_ratio="16:9" video_loop="yes" video_mute="yes" video_preview_image="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" margin_top="" margin_bottom="" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left=""][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type="1_2" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" padding="undefined" dimension_margin="undefined" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text] <b>CAGE releases report on purported threat of British fighters returning from Syria</b> <div></div> <div>Blowback - foreign fighters and the threat they pose written by CAGE's Research Director Asim Qureshi, (you can see Asim on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsr7Y8o-V6M&amp;list=UUgmdsvj_lJ96fhsjdBaCfyw">Newsnight </a>and <a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/should-we-fear-britons-who-go-to-syria-video">Channel 4 </a>speaking about British Fighters in Syria), argues that the threat of blowback by fighters returning from Syria is exaggerated and that counter-terrorism measures used to deal with the purported threat are alienating Muslims. The release of the report comes just weeks after Sir Richard Dearlove, former MI6 chief, claimed that the government had exaggerated the threat posed by returnees from the war in Syria in a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeFFtiEtriA">speech </a>at the Royal United Services Institute.</div> <div></div> <div>The main points of the report are:</div> <ul> <li>There is no empirical evidence of blowback because not only have the 58 of the 66 men that have been involved in terrorist plots since 9/11 never trained or fought overseas, they have cited foreign and domestic grievances as the main contributing factor.</li> <li>Britons fighting in Syria should be viewed through the prism of international law and not through a counter-terrorism paradigm.</li> <li>The threat of terrorism has always existed - The UK government's foreign and, more recently, its domestic policy has led to the continued threat of terrorism in the UK.</li> </ul> <div></div> <div>Selected quotes:</div> <div></div> <div>'In almost every single case of individuals having fought abroad, there is little to suggest that such training or fighting had resulted directly in the decision to carry out an act of political violence in the UK. What, however, is clear, is the correlation between foreign and domestic grievances against the UK government, and the decision by these men to be involved in some form of plot.'</div> <div></div> <div>'The form of blanket criminalisation that is being witnessed in response to the involvement of British men and women in Syria, is completely disproportional to any threat that has so far manifested. When juxtaposed with other societal issues, such as drugs or other forms of violent crime, no such disproportionate policy or securitisation is seen.'</div> <div></div> <div>'Current UK government policy in relation to Syria is both confused and dangerous. The government has been inconsistent in the way it has handled the revolutions in Libya and Syria. While in the former they were actively involved in supporting rebels and permitting foreign fighters to become involved, in the latter they have taken the approach that involvement constitutes.'</div> [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type="1_2" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" padding="undefined" dimension_margin="undefined" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text] Blowback report free download [/fusion_text][fusion_code]W2FkZF90b19jYXJ0IGlkPSZxdW90OzIzNDUzJnF1b3Q7XQ==[/fusion_code][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Submission to Home Office stop and search consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 13px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP_S44_CONSULTATION.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home office counter-terrorism stop and search consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p>

Submission to the Home Office Schedule 7 consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP___Schedule_7_review.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home Office submission to the Schedule 7 consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br />CagePrisoners welcomes the Home Office review of Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act of 2000. &nbsp;We commend the public review of these powers, which have been a great source of concern to Muslim communities in the UK and exacerbated existing tensions between law enforcement and minority groups.&nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Yet as we outline in this submission, CagePrisoners is doubtful that simply altering Schedule 7 powers as outlined in the Home Office report is sufficient, however well-meaning these changes may be. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Firstly, Muslim communities and minority groups complain of having been humiliated, frustrated and inconvenienced by Schedule 7 stops at a rate that far surpasses the non-Muslim majority. &nbsp;The very basis on which Schedule 7 searches are conducted &ndash; selection based on intuition or unspecified risk factors rather than reasonable suspicion &ndash; is counterproductive to combatting terrorism and may constitute a violation of human rights. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Secondly, the perception that to stop members of &ldquo;suspect communities&rdquo; rather than suspected individuals &ndash; as currently happens &ndash; is neither a moral nor an effective way to fight terrorism. CagePrisoners urges the Home Office to learn from the troubling legacies of other stop and search powers, namely Section 1 and 44, and the demonstrated existence of institutionalized racism in our police forces, as detailed in the MacPherson report. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Finally, Schedule 7 stops could become an easy gateway for law enforcement to pursue other kinds of civil and human rights abuses, as clearly demonstrated by the case of Madhi Hashi. &nbsp;As this submission details, while the proposed changes to Section 7 are a step forward, they are not enough to engender trust in minority communities about Schedule 7 powers, given that Schedule 7 has become so notorious for breaches of basic civil and human rights.</p>

The Conscious Muslim Guide

July 24, 2024
This is some text inside of a div block.

Letter to the EC president

March 8, 2021
This is some text inside of a div block.

Exploiting the Pandemic

May 14, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Letter to Home Secretary

January 23, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Schedule 7: Harassment at Borders

August 20, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

CCE Exposed Report

January 6, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

Africa Review: Ethiopia report

May 31, 2017
This is some text inside of a div block.

The 'Science' of Pre-Crime

September 28, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

Consent Denied report

January 29, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

CAGE Brochure

July 6, 2015
This is some text inside of a div block.

ISC inquiry NGO joint letter

November 8, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Serious Crime Bill Submission

October 23, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blowback report

July 17, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part II

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part I

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Guantanamo Begins at Home report

April 1, 2012
This is some text inside of a div block.

CagePrisoners Annual Report 2010-11

December 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Too blunt for just outcomes report

June 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Detention Immorality report

November 1, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blacklisted report

August 20, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Off the Record report

June 1, 2007
This is some text inside of a div block.

Fabricating Terrorism I report

March 1, 2006
This is some text inside of a div block.

Report on Ghost Detention

November 12, 2005
This is some text inside of a div block.

The Guantanamo Detainees report

May 13, 2004
This is some text inside of a div block.

Beyond the Law report

December 20, 2001
This is some text inside of a div block.
Button Text

monthly policy briefings

Each month, CAGE analysts will provide briefings on important policy developments in Britain, France and Austria relating to counter-terrorism and national security policies. The briefings are designed to be short, indispensable references for activists, academics and others interested in keeping up to date with the proliferation of War on Terror-era policies worldwide.